For Christmas I received an intriguing gift from a pal - my really own “very popular” book.

“Tech-Splaining for Dummies” (great title) bears my name and my image on its cover, wifidb.science and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, asteroidsathome.net with a couple of simple prompts about me provided by my pal Janet.

It’s a fascinating read, and wiki.monnaie-libre.fr really amusing in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of composing, but it’s likewise a bit repetitive, and extremely verbose. It may have exceeded Janet’s prompts in looking at data about me.

Several sentences start “as a leading innovation journalist …” - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There’s also a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no family pets). And there’s a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, considering that pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source big language design.

I’m not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can’t - just Janet, who produced it, can buy any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody producing one in anyone’s name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, developed by AI, and created “solely to bring humour and happiness”.

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is meant as a “customised gag gift”, and the books do not get further.

He wishes to widen his range, generating different genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It’s created to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - selling AI-generated items to human consumers.

It’s also a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar material based upon it.

“We should be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we really suggest human developers’ life works,” states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to regard developers’ rights.

“This is books, this is articles, this is photos. It’s masterpieces. It’s records … The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that.”

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn’t stop the track’s developer trying to nominate it for asteroidsathome.net a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, akropolistravel.com it was still extremely popular.

“I do not think using generative AI for innovative purposes should be prohibited, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people’s work without authorization ought to be prohibited,” Mr Newton Rex includes. “AI can be extremely powerful however let’s build it ethically and relatively.”

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China’s DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America’s swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have picked to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually decided to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to use developers’ content on the internet to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as “madness”.

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

“All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the nation’s creatives,” he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also highly against removing copyright law for AI.

“Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of happiness,” states the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

“The federal government is weakening one of its best carrying out industries on the unclear guarantee of growth.”

A government spokesperson stated: “No relocation will be made up until we are definitely confident we have a useful plan that provides each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to assist them license their content, access to top quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI designers.”

Under the UK federal government’s new AI plan, a national information library containing public data from a wide variety of sources will also be made available to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump’s go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector required to share information of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a number of suits versus AI firms, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, akropolistravel.com and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under “reasonable usage” and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of elements which can constitute fair usage - it’s not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn’t all enough to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple’s US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its technology for a portion of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American’s present dominance of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I actually want a “bestseller” I’ll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for bigger jobs. It is full of mistakes and hallucinations, galgbtqhistoryproject.org and it can be quite tough to check out in parts because it’s so long-winded.

But given how rapidly the tech is progressing, I’m not sure the length of time I can stay positive that my substantially slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in worldwide innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters worldwide.

Outside the UK? Register here.