For Christmas I got an interesting gift from a buddy - my very own “best-selling” book.

“Tech-Splaining for Dummies” (fantastic title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me supplied by my good friend Janet.

It’s an intriguing read, and really amusing in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of composing, but it’s also a bit repeated, and galgbtqhistoryproject.org very verbose. It may have exceeded Janet’s triggers in looking at data about me.

Several sentences start “as a leading technology reporter …” - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There’s likewise a mystical, repeated hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no pets). And there’s a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had offered around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, since rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source large language model.

I’m not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can’t - only Janet, who developed it, can order any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody creating one in any person’s name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and designed “solely to bring humour and pleasure”.

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is intended as a “customised gag gift”, and the books do not get sold further.

He intends to expand his variety, producing various categories such as sci-fi, and maybe using an autobiography service. It’s designed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human customers.

It’s likewise a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar content based upon it.

“We need to be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we actually indicate human creators’ life works,” states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to respect developers’ rights.

“This is books, this is posts, this is images. It’s artworks. It’s records … The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that.”

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn’t stop the track’s developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

“I do not believe using generative AI for creative functions need to be banned, however I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals’s work without authorization need to be prohibited,” Mr Newton Rex includes. “AI can be really powerful but let’s develop it morally and fairly.”

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for king-wifi.win their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China’s DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America’s swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have selected to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have actually chosen to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to material on the web to help develop their models, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as “madness”.

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

“All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the nation’s creatives,” he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also strongly against removing copyright law for AI.

“Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of pleasure,” states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

“The federal government is undermining one of its finest carrying out industries on the unclear promise of development.”

A government representative stated: “No relocation will be made till we are absolutely confident we have a practical plan that provides each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to assist them license their material, access to premium product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI developers.”

Under the UK government’s brand-new AI strategy, a nationwide data library including public information from a large range of sources will likewise be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump’s go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to want the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a number of claims versus AI firms, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under “reasonable usage” and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of elements which can constitute reasonable use - it’s not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training information and whether it ought to be paying for it.

If this wasn’t all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded free app on Apple’s US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a portion of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American’s existing dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I truly desire a “bestseller” I’ll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It is full of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to check out in parts because it’s so long-winded.

But given how rapidly the tech is progressing, I’m not exactly sure how long I can remain confident that my considerably slower human writing and editing skills, are better.

Sign up for oke.zone our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in international technology, with analysis from BBC reporters worldwide.

Outside the UK? Register here.